Reviewed program guide
Chapter 13 With a Student-Loan Adversary Proceeding
A consultation for California residents weighing a Chapter 13 repayment plan alongside the separate bankruptcy-court lawsuit that asks a judge to discharge student loans for undue hardship.
Two proceedings sit on top of each other here. The Chapter 13 case is the repayment plan: three or five years of court-supervised payments through a trustee, ending in a discharge of what remains of your other debts. Student loans are carved out of that discharge, both the ordinary one at plan completion and the hardship version for a plan that cannot be finished, so a plan alone never reaches them. The adversary proceeding is the second layer. Because the rules make any dispute about whether one specific debt is dischargeable into a lawsuit, canceling a student loan means filing a complaint inside your bankruptcy, serving the loan holder and the United States, putting on evidence, and obtaining a judgment. This offering is a consultation and review of whether that combination makes sense for you.
Reading this guide does not decide eligibility. The free screening checks your answers against reviewed routing criteria.
Coming soon
A video guide is in production
We are preparing a reviewed, captioned explainer for this program. The written guide below is available now.
At a glance
Overview
Two proceedings sit on top of each other here. The Chapter 13 case is the repayment plan: three or five years of court-supervised payments through a trustee, ending in a discharge of what remains of your other debts. Student loans are carved out of that discharge, both the ordinary one at plan completion and the hardship version for a plan that cannot be finished, so a plan alone never reaches them. The adversary proceeding is the second layer. Because the rules make any dispute about whether one specific debt is dischargeable into a lawsuit, canceling a student loan means filing a complaint inside your bankruptcy, serving the loan holder and the United States, putting on evidence, and obtaining a judgment. This offering is a consultation and review of whether that combination makes sense for you.
Who it may help
This review is for California residents who need what Chapter 13 offers, such as keeping a home, curing arrears, stopping a garnishment, or handling debts a Chapter 7 would not resolve, and who also want the student loans addressed rather than parked. It tends to matter most when income is steady enough to fund a plan yet leaves nothing after necessities, and when prospects are unlikely to change over the years a plan would run. Two threshold facts get checked early: whether your debts, student loans included, fit under Chapter 13's eligibility ceilings, and who holds each loan, since the government's attestation route exists only for loans the Department of Education holds. Screening can organize preliminary facts and records, but screening cannot determine qualification or select a final path.
How it works
You gather your financial records and loan history, and a California attorney reviews the whole picture with you. The review covers what a plan payment would look like, how a plan would treat the student loans while it runs, whether the eligibility limits are a problem, and how an undue-hardship claim would be built from your facts. You get a candid read on the strength of that claim, weak points included. If you go forward, filing the case and bringing the lawsuit are separate engagements on their own written terms; this consultation files nothing with the court. Whether the lawsuit belongs early in the plan or closer to its end is a judgment your attorney works through with you, case by case. Administrative support can help organize forms, records, and communications; it does not replace the decision-maker's review.
Documents and next steps
For the plan side: recent pay stubs, several years of tax returns, statements for every secured and unsecured debt, mortgage and vehicle payoff and arrears figures, property values, and household expense detail. For the loan side: your full federal aid history, who currently holds each loan, payment and forbearance records, prior applications for income-driven plans or discharges, and documentation of whatever keeps your income low, such as health records, disability findings, caregiving obligations, and work history. If a case is already underway, the trustee's payment ledger and any amended schedules belong in the file too, because a hardship claim has to be consistent with everything already sworn in the case. The next step is to compare the records with the cited official source and any current instructions issued by the responsible agency, court, creditor, or other decision-maker.
Read this carefully
Important considerations
The two proceedings pull against each other in ways worth understanding before you commit. Years of trustee payments build a record of good faith that helps a hardship claim, yet paying more toward the loans through the plan strengthens that record while weakening the argument that you cannot afford to repay. Paying less does the reverse and grows the balance. Sworn figures filed at the start of a case also go stale, so a claim brought near the end of a plan usually needs an entirely fresh income and expense package, and every amended schedule and plan modification along the way has to line up with it. No published government policy fixes when in a Chapter 13 the lawsuit should be brought, so timing is argued from law and local practice. Attorney judgment is separate from administrative help and is required for individualized legal strategy or advice.
Common questions
Frequently asked questions
These answers provide general information. Your facts and records determine what may apply.
If I complete a five-year plan, are my student loans gone?
No. The discharge you receive at the end of a Chapter 13 plan expressly leaves student-loan debt in place, and the hardship discharge for a plan that cannot be completed does the same. How a plan treats those loans while it runs, including whether it pays anything toward them, is a drafting decision your attorney makes with you. The only mechanism that reaches the loan itself is the separate undue-hardship lawsuit filed inside the same bankruptcy case, decided by the judge on evidence about your finances now, your prospects, and your past efforts to repay.
Should the lawsuit be filed early in the plan or at the end?
That is precisely the question your attorney weighs, and there is no government rule to point at: the Justice Department's guidance says nothing about Chapter 13 timing. Filing early lets recent sworn schedules do double duty and settles the question years sooner. Waiting means the court sees a completed payment record and a current budget, but it almost always requires rebuilding the financial package from scratch. Local practice and the case law of your circuit bear on it as well. Anyone who offers you a single right answer without looking at your file is guessing.
Can I bring the loan lawsuit if another attorney handles my Chapter 13?
It is possible, and it is also something the firm examines carefully before agreeing to it. A hardship claim is tested against everything sworn in the bankruptcy case, including schedules, amendments, and plan modifications, so two firms working from different records is a real risk to the claim. If you already have bankruptcy counsel, bring their filings to the consultation so the attorney can see whether the records line up and whether a split arrangement is workable on your facts.
Official sources
- U.S. Department of Justice (opens in a new window)
Retrieved Jul 24, 2026
- Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (opens in a new window)
Retrieved Jul 24, 2026
Important disclosure
This page provides general information, not a qualification or legal determination. Screening and services cannot guarantee approval, forgiveness, discharge, settlement, timing, or any particular result. The responsible agency, court, creditor, or other decision-maker applies the controlling requirements.
Your next step
See which paths may fit your situation
One free screening may identify this offering or a different reviewed path. An attorney decides legal strategy after reviewing the facts.